There is overwhelming solid evidence from various verified sources that the UST attacker is an entity with its name starting with a "C". If you know it, you know it. But does it even matter at this point? They are smart enough to pull this attack off.
-
-
Clearly it was an attack more then just “people selling into thin liquidity”. Really appreciate your work in uncovering TFL’s shady acts. But the attackers also deserves exposing. Would appreciate more research on the attacker and hope to bring justice to all the victims.
-
Why was it an attack? Exact what everyone knowledgeable predicted, happened. The game of hot potato ended.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I have solid evidence of the attacker.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
All actual on-chain research/data points to this. UST was about to explode, and someone triggered it inorganically. The $350M swap on 3pool by someone or some entity, right after TFL removed $150M, triggered the de-peg. I wouldn't say it wasn't an attack.
-
The attacker must have paid slippage fee of around $11M, if it was just another ordinary swap by the people in the community, they wouldn't have paid such slippage.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
We all know this it was initiated by a big entity and then retail slowly lost the confidence and started pulling out
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-
Are you happy?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.