FatMan

As you can see, @stablechen is also one of those who knew. Basically, this is to be expected.

what does "knowing" imply ? everybody who shut off their nodes knew I did not profit off the halt, simply put

Maybe it wasn't you, but someone made those massive insider trades right before the halt, and if you had any good in you you'd be interested in figuring out who that was. You should have been the one sending me these chats, not the other validators.

sure but that's hard to know and that's a risk present in any group entrusted to power - much harder when there's 130 people that need to make a quick decision the alternative is broadcast to the world they're going to halt the chain and give an opportunity to attackers

You're right, there's not many good ways to carry it out. I can't fault you on that. My two main gripes are TFL lying about it and the insider trades taking place. TFL lying is par for the course, but I really think it's important to hold the insider traders accountable.

yes and yes, but why the personal attacks and baseless accusations on me and my validator opportunistically profiting off doing our duty to protect the network? it's hard to know who did profit as the group quickly expanded and the information run amok and logs won't help

You have been personally attacking me, making fun of my sources, outright lying, and spinning things in TFL's favour for the past several weeks. I'm not personally attacking you, but I must say that I highly doubt your integrity based on the things you do & people you frat. with

I've only attacked your premature inference and jumping to conclusions Can you give examples where I've lied, I'd like to see I've not made fun of your sources, at most I've called it hearsay, which technically they are I just offer alternative interpretations