FatMan

Are you even reading it, it's literally link to Luna validator post?

I’ve stopped reading his tweets. At first I thought maybe he has a point when I first ran across a few tweets. But now it’s just plain negative and after reading Nansen in depth research report, his tweets are pointless.

He's uncovering shady shit and the only reason you don't accept it is because you have an interest in that he doesn't.

Me: "I would like governance discussions to be released in the interest of transparency." Sockpuppet account: "Shut up, paid fudder!" Validator who directly profited from said closed governance decisions: *retweets the sock's reply, which has one like* Yeah, pretty clear to me.

this is unsubstantiated libel, I did not profit at all. in fact our cashflow went to near $0 and we had to lay off nearly our entire team. we barely had enough time to make a decision to halt, and I was having dinner and away from my computer @sklivvz

so you admit to strategically cherry picking evidence when it suits your narrative?

Pleas @stablechen stop it for your own mental health. You clearly wrote you would provide all screens. If you changed your mi d, just say that and not post out "cherry picking" statements that make no sense. I so want to believe you are legit.