FatMan

This is a great step towards transparency and I am all for it - thank you. At no fault of @THORmaximalist's (he joined a bit later), several pages of this chat are missing including the most important parts - who knew about halting the market module, and how long before?https://twitter.com/THORmaximalist/status/1531683494711242753 …

@stablekwon @stablechen @sunnya97 Would one of you like to share the previous pages with @THORmaximalist, in the interest of transparency? TFL publicly stated that nobody knew about the chain halt before it happened, but I'll think you'll find the omitted pages disprove this.

You must be a paid fudder your sole mission is to wake up early and try and halt the progress of $LUNA. You have no evidence and everything is hearsay something you cannot adequately substantiate.

Are you even reading it, it's literally link to Luna validator post?

I’ve stopped reading his tweets. At first I thought maybe he has a point when I first ran across a few tweets. But now it’s just plain negative and after reading Nansen in depth research report, his tweets are pointless.

He's uncovering shady shit and the only reason you don't accept it is because you have an interest in that he doesn't.

Me: "I would like governance discussions to be released in the interest of transparency." Sockpuppet account: "Shut up, paid fudder!" Validator who directly profited from said closed governance decisions: *retweets the sock's reply, which has one like* Yeah, pretty clear to me.

this is unsubstantiated libel, I did not profit at all. in fact our cashflow went to near $0 and we had to lay off nearly our entire team. we barely had enough time to make a decision to halt, and I was having dinner and away from my computer @sklivvz