1.
$luna 2.0 needed to align incentives between builders and community.
You cannot pay a debt with money you don’t have. $luna 1 was rekt.
It couldn’t be about settling a debt, you can’t start a new project carrying it
It was about creating value from all the broken pieceshttps://twitter.com/FatManTerra/status/1531675439667810311 …
-
-
(especially when you consider that the magnitude at which they cashed out directly led to the instability of the system as a whole)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yea. I don't disagree. I think it couldn't be bad for the community to take over at this point, the authority figures are very polarizing, not in a good way. There's no coming back from that, it's like a big anchor that will drag you down.
-
I support Terra 2 - it will do great things. I support creating new value to benefit all investors, new and old. I do, however, have to reiterate that current leadership is incompetent & unethical. They must hand control back to the builders.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Luna 2.0 was a community project at the start before TFL & Do took over comms. The first governance proposal were fully from community.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Great discussion. Agree! T2 must be community run/driven/led.
@stablekwon and TFL should be builders like the rest, but not THE chain like previously.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.