This tweet did not age well. The guy who wrote this? His buggy code was committed into Mirror Protocol in June 2021, creating a hole that allowed an attacker to drain $88m from users just a few months later. https://github.com/Mirror-Protocol/mirror-contracts/commit/56c79bafa7b2f7693653d5144e2e3aab93673695#diff-61e7453301fdb7fea66099c942a799658950c63013da0257f88b9541d30a877fR182 …https://twitter.com/csanti_95/status/1492130389254893574 …
-
-
And the way you’re doing it isn’t “the responsible way.”
-
I posted a full post-mortem of what the bug was, how it functioned, and the transaction in which the exploit occurred. That is the responsible way of doing it. It's what this dev should have done instead of smuggling in a fix and staying silent. This much is clear - all the best.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
That’s making an assumption my man. No need to use inflammatory rhetoric like that. There are other ways you could neutrally describe those same set of actions.
-
You are assuming that they knew the bug was exploited, that it was fixed quietly as a coverup. Etc. it could have been devs trying to improve their protocol code for the future. Yes, it’s most certainly a problem that mirror was seemingly hacked for $88 million.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Replied elsewhere - that’s fair. Still would focus my energy more on the entity / top level, but yeah on mobile and didn’t realise the level of covering it up initially. My bad.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
