Reasons: - Citadel ($40b+) outright denied being involved with UST trading, why severely risk their reputation for $0.5b-$3b? (I don't know exact figures.) - You need a large amount of UST to execute this attack, which is not easy to get inconspicuously or on short notice (2/3)
-
-
Show this thread
-
Conclusions: - Whoever did this was most likely a big fund in the crypto space with at least some existing UST exposure - Do Kwon probably has some leads on who it is since he executed a bunch of OTC UST & LUNA sales throughout the year (3/3)
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Is it true ?
@stablekwon !?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I have no idea why people think Do Kwon isn't personally involved in this. It's obvious it required a massive amount of his own coin to pull off. He's the only one with the customer list.
-
So he bankrupted his own business on purpose?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Cringe There is no evidence of any attack. At all. You are perpetuating a narrative that gives Kwon cover to rob post depeg LUNA buyers. W2g
-
TFL losing tens of billions in paper profits isn't enough? They literally had multiple cash cows (Anchor, LUNA, Mirror) that they were slowly squeezing from at retail's expense; no point shutting it down this fast
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In the very beginning I believed it's not citadel that made this attach. They got into crypto not that ago and they started with market making Bitcoin why chose UST to attach.
-
It's an easy target. Opportunity to short with enough money due to the way the mechanism is designed. Another advantage of bringing regulation to the defi space.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.