FatMan

Sadly, today I learned some things about their structure that I didn't previously know - some things were misrepresented to me and some, admittedly, I didn't check up on due to being very busy at the time. One - the fee would not just be 2x - lawyers may take a cut too. (6/17)

Two - 50% of the tokens raised would be given to the multisig holders to 'slowly distribute' to the community. I assumed that all tokens would go to donors, and this part didn't really make sense to me - a legitimate DAO would not have this level of centralization. (7/17)

Three - proposals made on Snapshot for the DAO would be 'filtered'. This was revealed today, and it confused me - shouldn't DAO holders have a final say on what happens with their donations? Why should an internal group control proposals? (This reminds me of someone...) (8/17)

Over the past few days, they pressured me to release their links to the public ASAP. I was patient and I told them I needed some time to think. I'm glad I did. Due to these new facts, I have decided not to share their link with the public. There were too many red flags. (9/17)

This may sound like bad news, but there's a happy ending to this story that makes it all worth it. My Twitter account receiving this much exposure caught the attention of several high profile law firms and litigation funders from across the world, mostly the US. (10/17)

I believe this case will be historic, and I believe combining our research with legal discovery will lead to the most shocking court battle in all of crypto history. Law firms seem to agree - I am in talks with a select few and we will release more information soon. (11/17)

I am happy to announce that three law firms have offered to commit over $15m (maybe more) to this historic fight for justice - they are looking to fund the case and will collect fees on a contingency basis. This could never have happened without all of you. (12/17)

I'm currently brokering the best deal possible for UST victims within our class of retail investors - right now, the haircut range is expensive (a traditional cut going to lawyers), but optimistically this should come down - I'm verifying claim data and working hard BTS. (13/17)