We are at the phase of the controversy where we extrapolate one anonymous "source" as a truth. Hundreds of builders and community members contributed feedback to the proposal and it's been overwhelmingly supported as a good if not perfect solution.https://twitter.com/FatManTerra/status/1528807107042099200 …
-
So one day this vote means nothing, but the next day it does ?https://twitter.com/FatManTerra/status/1528791845702184963 …
Community votes mean nothing to the Terra blockchain and for true action. What LUNA holders want to vote in will be voted in. Chris said the proposal had 'overwhelming support as good,' which is an obvious lie if you've been following the proposal discussions in any capacity.
-
-
I have been following the proposal discussions indeed. I'm not sure we have the same definition for "community" though. To me, a community member is someone who has been in this ecosystem for longer than a month.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
New commers want the burn. Pre attack holders wants the fork. There’s a reason why delegation was stopped. To not hijack the chain’s governance.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes. the proposal have an overwhelming support as good. Not perfect, but surely the way to go. I know a lot of terra users (not luna speculators from the post depeg) and I'm yet to see one that wants the burn over the current proposal.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.