Quite a few people are asking, so here's my long-form opinion on why both UST holders who sold at a loss and people who are still holding UST deserve full restitution. This probably won't interest most of you, but it needs to be explained to those doubting it. (1/8)
-
-
And, scene. Both of these are completely rational responses to the crisis. Both groups lost too much. I believe both should be taken into consideration and should be refunded *exactly* what they lost pro rata. Did you sell at $0.30? $0.70 refund. Did you hold? Full refund. (8/8)
Show this thread -
PS. Ethically, our first priority should be pre-depeg savers who bought UST at $1 (they paid $1 and expected nothing more than $1 back per token). Speculators who bought UST (a now suddenly speculative & volatile asset with a fresh risk profile) at $0.30 can take a backseat.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Let’s be honest, strippers give more reliable financial advice than Do Kwon….I think he said stay strong just before everyone lost their money
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think % loss should be irrelevant, since loss is loss and should be recouped, those who did better than others did so by taking risk too, so should be rewarded
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I am the one
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There are a third option: You want to sell but Mirror or Aperture locked your funds. They released the funds when UST worth is 0.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.