Incredible how much disinformation there is around @stablekwon 's proposal to fork @terra_money .
The main argument against him is "CZ said is better to burn $LUNA ", and well I agree, burning LUNA would be better, but where do you think we can get the funds to burn more LUNA?
-
Show this thread
-
Burning LUNA is categorically not better. You will need trillions of dollars to make a meaningful difference to actual LUNA victims, and in the process you will enrich people who bought the gigabottom (they will turn $100 into several million). A fork makes sense.
81 replies 12 retweets 147 likes -
Replying to @FatManTerra @ale_cande11 and
People who buy at low should be the one to receive higher percentage of competition because those are the ones who truly believe the project by buying up to help sustain the price while who buy at the highest price where panic selling to others project...burn supply
2 replies 1 retweet 16 likes -
Replying to @EdiboiLucky @FatManTerra and

NOBODY, as in NOBODY, bought $luna at ANY TIME to 'sustain the price', 'defend the peg' or whatever. EVERYONE, at EVERY TIME bought$luna TO MAKE MONEY. This stupidity about the sanctimonious holders at the top and lowlife buyers at the bottom has got to stop.#luna6 replies 2 retweets 11 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.