It will be luckily to see .01 ever..
A tax on every transaction to create artificial scarcity. No revenue model or authentic demand. Did the #BurnLuna guys already forget how SafeMoon ended?
Also, where will you find a trillionaire from? LUNC is never going back to $1 without some intergalactic-level firepower.https://twitter.com/Cox3ox/status/1527406264321462282 …
-
-
-
Dude after 27. it's going to 0.0infinity000
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It would cost 2 billion to buy up 6 trillion Luna. And a 10% burn tax would still earn traders plenty and reduce billions a day.
-
No, If they decide to buy 6 trillion
$Luna it will cost 832,500 million - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
"If it sounds too complicated it is probably wrong"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why don’t we just burn 70% of our tokens?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Luna-Decentralized no... It's private company who follows its goals
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think a fee less than 0.1% could work.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The difference is that Luna is a giant, trading high volume due the speculation. The fee is irrelevant considering the possibility of gains and the burn notice will move the market even more. This must be temporary and can even send part of the tax to pre crash luna/just holders.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks for stating what *should* be obvious but clearly is not for a lot of people.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.