You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Not an accusation - I want someone from TFL to explain what happened - they are silent. Proposals that pass do not just disappear or throw a 'failed' error. What happened here? Does someone have control over governance beyond validators? Can passed proposals just be ignored?
We have some new information. The proposal failed because the UST amount was incorrect (a withdrawal happened between then and now). A UI bug occurred due to the rarity of passed but failed proposals. Let's see what happens next - maybe someone will propose it again?pic.twitter.com/U0ljHZgBOz
Thoughts: - The proposal disappearing, although initially worrying, is now not shady at all after a satisfactory explanation - Even devs being paid $1m a month can make simple UI mistakes - I feel like TFL communication & speed could be improved greatly across the board
So its going to execute now ? They will do after adjustment?
Perhaps the person who made the proposal the first time can reformulate with the new amount? Also,what happens if the amount changes again? There must be a way to get it done no matter the amount
It would have been as easy as just proposing to burn all UST in the community pool, without specifying amount. Maybe a proposal to make people believe that there was a plan?
I imagine regardless of the adjustments it will conveniently fail again
The amount should be set to whatever is in the community account instead of an exact number for these reasons 
I'm tired of seeing otherwise passing proposals invalidated on technicalities. Same thing happened in $JUNO with Prop 16.
How can this be avoided in the future? Saying "100% of the UST" instead of the exact number? A situation like this shouldn't have to start over from scratch.
Extremely shady, how come no mention of this until after passing?
What they did not check?? Anyone not see a pattern here.
This is still some shady bs, as the error is relatively minor. The intent and success of the vote is clear.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
