Firstly, because it takes a special kind of asshole to say "I have such and such material success, ergo I'm a doer." Secondly, because their various homebrew theories on everything under the sun are just as stupid, ideologically motivated or straight-up bought as any other.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @Triquetrea
Well said. This highlights the fallacy (which extends beyond intellectualism) that anyone who is "successful" by [insert relative standard] can by definition give an authoritative account of why they are in fact that way, and why that's the "right" approach.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @Failed_Buddhist @Triquetrea
(See endless supply of athlete-endorsed diets and alt medicine.)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Failed_Buddhist
Yes, but worse: even insightful people often don't know *why* they're insightful, so their pet theories are often BS. E.g. I have *very* strong intuitions about people - they can be extremely accurate, but belief in my theories about people has always let me down.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @Triquetrea @Failed_Buddhist
Once I learned that I have no idea why something I do works, even if it works, I stopped believing much in my own theories. That has really helped, though it makes epistemic doubt as intellectual cop-out a real danger to be mindful of. Some things are more true than others.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Triquetrea @Failed_Buddhist
epistemic doubt shall be the whole of the law
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @danlistensto @Failed_Buddhist
Ironically, it can develop into its own kind of myopic certitude.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
(Though on average "I know nothing," does less damage than "I know for certain.")
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Triquetrea @danlistensto
I'm generally comfortable with "I have such and such suspicion" or "this seems to be happening". That is the bedrock of a scientific attitude (that's not to say all scientists actually have this attitude in practice).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Failed_Buddhist @danlistensto
I'm even okay with a lot more certainty than that, when it's built on something. It's certainty that survives legitimate challenges that bothers me.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I'm willing to go there if it serves a function, but paradoxically the higher the feeling of certainty behind a claim the more skeptical one should be. In this case, by skepticism I mean openness to the possibility of being misled by emotional conviction, not outright dismissal.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.