I was struggling to formulate a criticism of Buddhism yesterday, and ended up botching it a bit. Now I know: The fundamental truth of suffering is a core tenet, towards which I'm a bit leery. I'm leery not of the idea itself - I agree that it's sound - but of how it's handled.
-
Show this thread
-
The backdrop for my own practice is so eclectic, it hardly bears scrutiny. I've never practiced anything *properly*, preferring instead to steal. I use Finno-Ugric myth, Hindu philosophy and Buddhist technique for my own purposes, plus whatever else comes along.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
Resultantly, I'm never quite sure how to interface with people. My personal system is such a messy cobweb of associations, it could only work for me. I'm not planning to be any sort of guru, so at most I will only pass along technique and individual ideas when I want to.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
Anyway, for Buddhism specifically: I agree that suffering is a fundamental part of experience. Totally. Unequivocally. I don't agree that it's always a useful lens through which to *interpret* experience.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
There are a lot of tremendously useful Buddhist techniques. Many parts of Buddhism are essentially improvements on (at the time) antiquated Hindu sutras. But that doesn't mean the metaphysics are very useful to people.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
If we reference Finno-Ugric myth, we do find suffering as an ever-present concept. What else would you expect? These peopled lived in extremely harsh environs. Maybe 2% of us today would survive in the North of antiquity. It's a harsh place to live even today.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
The entire cosmology, all the myths, all the stories, default to this harsh reality. When you die, you don't go to heaven. Your bones are ground to dust in the river of death. You may end up tormented there, as a shade, forever. There is no happy ending.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
So what do you do? You don't overcome or surpass suffering. You simply get on with the day. You persevere, but not out of some mystical attainment - simply because that's the only option in the face of such a hopeless state of affairs.
2 replies 2 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @Triquetrea
In the Therevada tradition, once you fully understand the three marks of existence and can see them clearly at any moment, then you stop fretting about it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
That's why the emphasis is placed on impermanence, suffering, and no-self. It's not that you have to constantly be thinking about how awful everything is.
-
-
Replying to @Failed_Buddhist
That's a fair point. My bone to pick is usually with Mahayana, or various Westernizations of different Buddhist traditions.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.