On circumcision, 'intactivists' are just wrong - latimes http://www.latimes.com/la-oe-allen-anti-circumcision-activists-20120812,0,2269752.story … The notion that circumcision reduces a man's sexual sensitivity has little basis in fact. Obsession with penis is the issue of the men in movement & their sex life.
-
-
Replying to @DrChaya
Hi again. I was going to drop this, but since you are still tweeting about it
I just want to leave this right here. This page does a good job of summing of some of the anatomical point intactivists make regarding physical benefits of keeping foreskin:https://www.foregen.org/human_foreskin 4 replies . 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @crypto_spawn
don't invite a scientist to a party and then not expect her to do research
1 reply . 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DrChaya
Yes please. We want everyone to do research. There are several studies that come to different conclusions about the issue. The facts are many men have been physically and psychologically impaired by circumcision. Unfortunately many men aren’t really aware of what they’ve lost.
2 replies . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @crypto_spawn
sorry all the research I did does not support your claim. You lost me. It is anti-semitism.
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes
So if being against circumcision is anti-Semitic I assume you are pro Female genital mutilation cause by your logic being against it is Islamophobic, so either you are pro FGM or you are a racist bigot
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.