Why having a smaller stage list is bad/other thoughts in one big post Read: http://tl.gd/n_1spt50u
-
-
I mean, 64 had only 1 legal stage, given there were only 8 characters, but the one stage is still better for some chars. than others.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Does it matter? The point is having less stages means less stages you have to learn.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ExciIed
It does matter, actually A game with an established meta and rule set doesn't need to change Totally different game
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I guess, but they only established that ruleset by experimenting and testing. We should at least try a major tournament without lylat/dsr.
3:58 PM - 23 May 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

| 11th in MA SSBU | Community Leader for NESU | he/him | toxic | PR Panelist |
| priv: