Good thread on the "PG&E paradox" - it being a decidedly awful public utility and also being faced with a terrible set of choiceshttps://twitter.com/gilbeaq/status/1182425522762063872 …
On the contrary - when done right the stockholders shoulder the risk, reap the profits. The added value is being able to qualify for massively larger debt, and thereby sponsor larger, more advanced projects. But I don't see that happening here, which is the failure I question.
-
-
I'd rather have the state do that, because I have not seen that happen in practice with PG and E. I don't fault the lion for eating the giraffe though. It's the lion's nature.
-
There has been a "municipalization" movement in electric utilities, but it's reversed because the results were not good.
- Još 8 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.