Good thread on the "PG&E paradox" - it being a decidedly awful public utility and also being faced with a terrible set of choiceshttps://twitter.com/gilbeaq/status/1182425522762063872 …
I have to disagree - the whole regulated rates/public financing model of utilities is a beautiful wedding a capitalism and socialism imo. It's not being done right though.
-
-
It's a disaster and has been for a very long time. There is no public good for it to have stockholders, it doesn't add value to the people of CA.
-
On the contrary - when done right the stockholders shoulder the risk, reap the profits. The added value is being able to qualify for massively larger debt, and thereby sponsor larger, more advanced projects. But I don't see that happening here, which is the failure I question.
- Još 10 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.