Evan SelingerOvjeren akaunt

@EvanSelinger

Prof. at RIT. Philosophy of Technology: ethics, law & policy, whole lot of privacy & power. Latest book: Re-Engineering Humanity. Op-Eds everywhere.

Vrijeme pridruživanja: kolovoz 2010.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @EvanSelinger

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @EvanSelinger

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    A last shout-out to the brilliant and others whose encouragement has been one of the very best things about turning myself into a novelist. And to anyone and everyone who picks up a copy: happy reading!

    Poništi
  3. When asked me about Clearview AI, I said we need a "thoroughgoing reexamination of what private & public mean that shifts...key debates in law, ethics" b/c "people can have legitimate privacy interests in publicly shared information."

    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 22 sata

    A weaponized 1st Amendment is poised to deregulate vast swathes of the information economy: Antitrust, privacy, consumer protection, communications, the FDA, and much more are all in the crosshairs.

    Poništi
  5. Predictable that Clearview AI CEO weaponized 1st Amendment in his defense of scraping public images of faces without consent. warned us of “zones of immunity” where appeals to the law are made to buttress against legal accountability. Take down notices aren’t enough.

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    4. velj

    🔥Washington state’s face surveillance moratorium bill just passed unanimously out of the House policy committee!! HB 2856 🔥

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. An unfortunate aspect of the facial recognition technology debate is that some believe once errors are hypothetically eliminated the governance problems will go away. makes the right counter-argument: This is a moral, not empirical problem.

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    . on harassment and deepfakes. on surveillance and work. on her book, Cult of the Constitution. on her book, Between Truth and Power. on AI.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    First class today as visiting prof at . “Civil Liberties in the Digital Age” will incl work by &

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    4. velj
    Odgovor korisnicima

    And to your and Woody’s vision! And to ’s pathbreaking research and advocacy! And to and ’s success! And and and!!!!

    Poništi
  12. Amazing, just informed me that the ed board of is advocating for a *statewide* (not city-by-city) moratorium on face recognition! This principled rejection of "resistance is futile" ideology owes a large debt to Kade & .

    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    3. velj

    Today I signed a letter accepting the invitation from the Secretary of Health and Human Services to serve on the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB). I will do my best to serve with integrity.

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    My new article in Antipode is honestly one of the best things I’ve ever written; certainly one I’m most proud of. The Internet of Landlords: Digital Platforms and New Mechanisms of Rentier Capitalism

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. (or steel mill, or airline, or communication system, and so on).” So, is facial recognition tech a weak version of the inherently political technology—one whose affordances invite creeping authoritarianism & make moral claims criticism hard for the majority to take seriously?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. practical necessity appear increasingly obsolete, “idealistic,” and irrelevant. Whatever claims one may wish to make on behalf of liberty, justice, or equality can be immediately neutralized when confronted with arguments to the effect, “Fine, but that’s no way to run a railroad”

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. public life.” Winner’s big question is whether moral concerns can drive large-scale change when inherently political technologies are adopted. “It is characteristic of societies based on large, complex technological systems, however, that moral reasons other than those of

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. with systems that are more accessible, comprehensible, and controllable than huge centralized sources. In this view solar energy is desirable not only for its economic and environmental benefits, but also for the salutary institutions it is likely to permit in other areas of

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. reasonable to build solar systems in a disaggregated, widely distributed manner than in large-scale centralized plants; politically speaking, solar energy accommodates the attempts of individuals and local communities to manage their affairs effectively because they are dealing

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. based on coal, oil, and nuclear power; at the same time, they do not maintain that anything about solar energy requires democracy. Their case is, briefly, that solar energy is decentralizing in both a technical and political sense: technically speaking, it is vastly more

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. unpredictable. The internal social system of the bomb must be authoritarian; there is no other way.” 2) Solar energy: “Many advocates of solar energy have argued that technologies of that variety are more compatible with a democratic, egalitarian society than energy systems

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·