You claim she's principled by posting a piece that provides specific cogent arguments and examples that she's not.
A wholly unavailing piece. @JRubinBlogger is an essential, principled voice for liberty in America. If you’re not following her already, I strongly recommend it.http://www.nationalreview.com/article/454701/jennifer-rubin-trump-obsession-mindless-opponent …
-
-
-
Nope. I’ll take a crack at it, as
@JRubinBlogger has better things to do. OK. the first cited assertion is that Rubin opposed Obama signing the Paris accord. Yes? Good. Now,@charlescwcooke does not link to Rubin’s piece, though he dishonestly implies it:pic.twitter.com/kx5WSfcu5P
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Well, I just opened a bottle of wine.
-
It's not even an excuse. And excuse would indicate that you feel that you would need to explain yourself further. But you don't. You have a bottle of wine. The alternative is talking about Evan McMullin. That is not an alternative. That is simply a bad choice. Drink up.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I could just as easily have written the piece about him.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Indeed. I enjoy
@JRubinBlogger’s journalism and I remember clearly she was leading on this story throughout 2016 and not merely 2017. It is sad to see@NRO descend to such a level, but like@PRyan, they have consented to take the King’s shilling. Jennifer Rubin has not. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Refute one word of
@charlescwcooke’s article, Evan. Just one word. I’ll wait.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Love Jennifer Rubin! We may have policy differences but she is a person of integrity and decency.
-
If you wait a week, you won't have policy differences anymore!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.