It's absolutely outrageous that the President and the party in power refuse to counter Russian interference.http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/28/politics/officials-struggle-convince-trump-russia-threat/index.html …
-
Perhaps the President doesn't differentiate between the Russia and collusion investigations because he knows they're one in the same.
pic.twitter.com/LArcrBHpmM
What would we call it if we had a president who refused to take seriously an obvious national security threat? Dereliction at least...pic.twitter.com/mBTpKvsLT0
-
-
Ah, yes. Dereliction. Ambassador Burns puts it very well.pic.twitter.com/mxeWJPR4yi
- 12 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It's treason, plain and simple. How does this not constitute "high crimes and misdemeanors?"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's beyond outrageous. Beyond a scandal. It's an ongoing attack on the American citizen.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'd call 45 a Traitor to the American people and democracy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If we don't act NOW against this President,how could we ever justify acting against ANY President in the future?We can't have a bar this low
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is where I can't follow defenders of POTUS on RU. Best case scenario at this point regarding his response on Russia is gross negligence
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A malignant narcissist destroying his own family from the inside which survivors of them will tell you they do 100%
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.