QUESTION- Why the URGENCY to fire Comey (without a replacement or even a phone call), but NOT to fire Flynn.....
Whether the President's firing of Comey has impeded the Russia investigation is secondary to whether Trump intended it to have that effect.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Exactly. And when your boss "hopes" something gets done, that's not passive hope, that's motive, proactive hope. That's an order.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Trump may intend to replace Comey with an FBI director who will pledge loyalty and lift the cloud of the Russia investigation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There you go, Evan, being all logical and principled again.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's not secondary; it's legally irrelevant on the issue of obstruction of justice. Period.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Precisely. It's irrelevant whether or not actual obstruction occurred. It's whether Trump attempted to obstruct, which he did.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Odd the President has not asked about the Russian election interference investigations? Would that not be your #1 NatSec issue?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.