His district only voted 47% for Trump, down a LOT from other GOP presidential turnouts in past.
Whether the Judiciary can review the Executive's security-related rules is especially important under Trump. This court ruled that it can.pic.twitter.com/o9Bs2nmFoS
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
-
The True Silent Majority are Awakening
#ACCOUNTABILITY nothing LESS!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If Courts cannot review security issues, it's a loophole big enough to push a Fourth Reich through.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Donny has acted w few checks in his life. Conned his way through life. He should've shown up 4 civics class.
#ruleOfLaw !!!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
, yes that's the Marbury v Madison moment of this stinging rebuke. The Court reestabished judicial review.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
now is when a wounded narcissist is most dangerous. Need to be aware of strike back to prove righteousness inc violence
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I did and also called the Office of Government Ethics at (202) 482-9300 extension #5 and left a complaint.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
President Obama was a constitutional scholar! He knew better than to do something like this.
-
Actually SCOTUS ruled against Pres Obama's EOs quite a few times. http://thefederalist.com/2016/07/06/obama-has-lost-in-the-supreme-court-more-than-any-modern-president/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.