It wasn't intended to. Its sole purpose was to provide a way for millions of people (c)
The ACA didn't do anything about the underlying costs of health care https://www.facebook.com/NPR/videos/10154686117316756 … @NPRWeekend
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Agree. Love that someone tried for a fix instead of standing on the sidelines whining. Now fix it. Or whine.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I love that he calls it the ACA and not Obamacare. Respect shown even when you disagree. Character.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
I don't think this is factual.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The commerce clause is supposed to be a shield, not a sword.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
no it didn't but as someone who depends on it for coverage I hope there is a better plan than just "repeal it"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
thank you for representing Real Americans who see trump for the liar he is. I'm proud to say I support you.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But it did provide Healthcare to more people. Imagine how much better it would have been if GOP worked with Dems
-
well... Dems SHOVED the ACA through with a majority in Congress so exactly how did GOP mess it up?
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.