You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Alan Dershowitz pretends that if ANY abuse of power is impeachable then ALL abuses of power must result in impeachment, which would empower Congress over the president in a destabilizing way unintended by the framers. But clearly that isn’t the case.
The House, representing and accountable to the people, is charged with deciding when an abuse of power requires impeachment, and it must be so. Otherwise, for example, presidents could abuse their power to undermine elections and hold onto power regardless of the people’s will.
Don’t doubt that #tRump hasn’t already fantasized about that.
Maybe... NOT abuse your power in the first place?
The House can’t unilaterally decide what constitutes abuse of power based solely on who controls the House and who is in the WH.
If abuse of power is constitutional, does that mean he can stay a third term? I mean, if no one can hold him accountable...
I mean, it *is* for the good of the nation, so.... 
But it can be a purely partisan action in response to losing an election.
Doesn't his arguments make the orange turnip more of a king? If it's in the Kong's judgement it's good for him, the state, it's above the law?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
