The “economy” you speak of means the very rich are doing well, while the vast majority of us “ordinary folks” are struggling paycheck to paycheck with paltry pay.
What sense would it make to nominate a self-described socialist calling for “revolution” to pull swing voters away from an incumbent riding economic expansion and a 3.5% jobless rate? Nominate someone who will do more to help those still left behind AND keep the economy moving.
-
-
-
That's true. The GOP keeps on saying what a great economy we have with the high stock market, but only about 10% of Americans own stocks.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
None. But then again, you're talking about the party who lost to DJT.
-
As opposed to the party that nominated him. I wish these so-called fiscal conservatives would fight for control of their own party.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This isn't designed to pull swing voters. It's designed to activate people on the left who were staying home, first-time voters, etc. "Swing voters" weren't the problem in 2016. Turnout was. That can be solved by someone with policies voters can get behind.
-
Unfortunately those policies can’t be passed without a senatorial super majority
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Getting a little nervous Democrats might not nominate a Republican-lite, huh?
-
EXACTLY what I thought. I don’t need a Republican to tell me who my candidate should be. (And I’m not Sanders fan, which is none of his concern)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You have no idea how much most people are struggling, do you?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.