Bernie’s not a Democrat, and he’s not going to be the Democratic candidate. Next.
-
-
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
When one party labels everything that yields a public benefit "socialism," it is not hard to understand why anything that yields a public benefit is then defined as "socialism."
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
They're talking about *Democratic* socialism, which is significantly different from what you described.
-
Here you go
@EvanMcMullin scroll about halfway down the page to this paragraph: Democratic socialists also believe strongly in democracy and democratic principles.https://goo.gl/rHoAY5 - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
For Republicans, socialism is anything that doesn't benefit them personally.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Republicans have spent the last 40 years calling anything that involved any kind of government oversight "socialism". Now it only applies to the Marxian definition? Pick the motte or the bailey, you can't have both.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The problem is that the GOP finds it strategically helpful to generically brand all Democrats as “Socialists” as a pejorative, thus robbing it of all meaning. Heck, they’ve been doing it in bad faith since before FDR.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.