It has literally been proven beyond any doubt--b/c Loughner survived+left copious journals--that Giffords shooting was NON-political.
This paragraph in today's NYT editorial on Alexandria shootings is offensively, quasi-Stalinistically wrong: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/14/opinion/steve-scalise-congress-shot-alexandria-virginia.html …pic.twitter.com/LkJFifUh73
-
-
-
Why does NYT insist on falsehood? B/c they remember despicable editorial they wrote back in 2011, before facts were in, blaming it on Palin.
-
This is the most craven sort of ass-covering: the author hopes you don't remember, or won't check Wikipedia. Just nod along smugly.
-
I can only spit.
-
My God I missed this gem in the next paragraph, which only proves my point.pic.twitter.com/749tTHIbpW
-
the best bit: the progressive OurRevolution just quietly deleted this tweet they'd posted yesterday. Check out Virginia.pic.twitter.com/RvnCf1g4uI
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
holy shit.
-
as
@johnekdahl said, it's almost as if it was written specifically to prove@AceofSpadesHQ's point about the media. -
Why are you not right now buying guns and ammo? Also, and significantly, Radiohead sucks.
-
kurt i live in chicago and i've never even held a gun in my hands in my entire life, much less fired or owned one. blue-city livin'.
-
Chicago has almost 15,000 concealed carry holders now. Progress, man.
@KurtSchlichter@MZHemingway@JohnEkdahl@AceofSpadesHQ -
That you consider that progress is genuinely one of the saddest things I've ever heard. God help us.
-
I've never held a gun in my life and I consider it progress too. Funny how that works.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is simply the NYT's way of saying "We have no particular problem with the targets selected this time."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm dropping my sub. I've bought the paper on a daily basis for 40 years. It's been moving this way, but now without a doubt, worthless.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
New conversation -
-
-
In India we are not surprised at all and we know how Ney York Times publishes biased news
-
really? What nonsense have they written that you knew was false?
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.