That is a pile of 
. One of the 18 charges was “child pornography,” presumably photos of the victim on his phone (which BTW, would have been strong evidence supporting other charges). Prosecuting child pornography charge NEVER requires the victims’ or parents’ cooperation.https://twitter.com/TheMarinaTimes/status/1308486650469572609 …
-
Show this thread
There are many men languishing in jail because they had photos of unknown and unidentified underage kids on their computers. An real DA would have charged the child rapist with as many charges as they could. This is nothing but @chesaboudin letting a child rapist go.
0 replies
1 retweet
5 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.