Why do we all accept and repeat this nonsense? Its wildly funny! It’s like someone from Men in Black took one of those neurolyzers to all of the STEM community and turned them into amnesiacs. Yet anyone can look up a history of peer review anywhere:https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/information-culture/the-birth-of-modern-peer-review/ …
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
Now you know: Universal Peer Review is a very recent means of protecting institutions and *incumbents* from upstarts and science. This isn’t science. This is the DISC. We now return you to your previous simple beliefs about Science and its practice:https://youtu.be/EhZnNld6bxQ
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Peer review by journal ed. process is mostly gatekeeping - post pub peer review (incl twitter) more useful. Many useful analyses of current, relevant topics R not suitable for journals. Esp in prestige journals, publication is acad. gamesmanship, not so much helping sci progress
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Science is corporate-owned. The false things proven, and true things obfuscated & avoided, conincidently align with profit maximization math. Negative externalities are big money. Someone from the outside has to break America’s corrupt system (e.g. China).
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Remember how Einstein struggled to get through peer review?pic.twitter.com/maeLwul3et
-
The issue with Einstein was that his ideas were so large that they distorted the very fabric of peer review. He’ll be proven wrong any day now.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
In my old field (signal processing, information theory) peer review works very well. If you’re not convinced just look at the amazing success over the years and similarly other lateral fields (eg machine learning) that follow the exact same peer review process
-
Machine learning or really anything computational is a poor example thanks to how easily methodological errors are detected. There is often an implementation if not the exact source code to point at and use. Do that in climate science, psychology, economics, or medicine.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.