And just to anticipate the expected comparisons, this is an actual intellectual bubble. Not an ideological bubble. Not a pseudo intellectual bubble. Not a propaganda bubble. These are true intellects experiencing the greatest fall from the highest of heights. They’re true giants.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The drift of physics into unfalsifiability is over:https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10509-017-3128-6 …
-
It’s truly odd that unfalsifiable hypothesis were taken on by others. When teaching science to kids unfalsifiability is a core test in formulating hypothesis.
-
Physicists all pay lip service to falsifiability, but they soon work out that avoiding it, by becoming abstract, is a quick way to avoid embarrassment.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I disagree. "String theory" is not a theory, it is a framework of consistent quantum theories which reduce to Einstein's gravity at long distances. No other framework does that. Having *a* theory of quantum gravity is not the same as having *the* theory of quantum gravity.
-
Analogously, "gauge theory" is not a theory, it is a framework of theories with local redundancy. Most are unphysical, many are inconsistent. But plug in the right redundancy, the right matter content, and you get all of particle physics!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And yet, despite not knowing what to say, you can't keep yourself from speaking.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Damn, shots fired
-
Shots fired into his own foot.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
String theory has made experimentally verified predictions through holography! It correctly predicted the ratio of shear viscosity to turbulence of a quark gluon plasma for example
-
That's not correct... holographic analogues of QGP hold (conjecturally) the lowest theoretical value for such a ratio, but even though real-life QGP displays a very low value, it confirms nothing: the holographic models do not reduce to the correct theory of strong interactions.
-
At best, it props up the hopes of finding a holographic model of quantum chromodynamics (not of highly symmetric analogues of it, as is the case) that postdicts such a find.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Awful take; please see my retweet
-
Rather than saying ‘see my retweet’, why don’t you just copy and paste what you said in your retweet?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
After reading my first book on string theory in 2003, I remember thinking, "Don't all of these smart people realize they are working on a giant analogy?" I never revisted the topic again.
-
I get that feeling about the entirety of particle physics: Invent new equation (pretty lattice) to fit previously-discovered particles, note un-filled holes, build giant collider, fill holes, rinse, repeat. It's lattices and equations all the way down folks. Save your billions.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Brian Greene > Eric Weinstein
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“anything I don’t understand is post-modernism”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Just what exactly do you think "post-modern" means?
-
“Every thing I don't like or can't be fucked to understand”.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.