That would be so thing. He will blast them.
Is that another way of saying they are above the Twitter law? "Twitter plans to place a disclaimer on future tweets from world leaders that break its rules but which Twitter decides are in the "public interest," the company said in a blog post Thursday."https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/27/tech/twitter-trump-rules/index.html …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The public is interested in threats
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Imagine life if TRUMP did not have the twitter platform he has now. Twitter is making it way too easy to spread his propaganda. 10 times worse than FAUX news!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How exactly is threatening a U.S. House member in the "public interest"? What they are really saying is they don't want to lose accounts if Trump was suspended or better yet deleted.
-
I suppose the charitable explanation could be that Twitter feels it’s in the public interest that we *know* a Representative has been threatened by POTUS.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He's getting worse and getting away with it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If they suspended trumps account he’d go berserk what would he do all day?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Don’t forget Twitter is a business. Trump’s a draw.
-
Yep. So now he's covered on threatening Schiff...
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.