Energy and Climate

@EnergyJvd

Engineering for people and nature. Tweeting against antinuclear "green" incompetence. Dutch/English. MSc.

Europe
Joined May 2010

Tweets

You blocked @EnergyJvd

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @EnergyJvd

  1. Pinned Tweet
    11 Apr 2017

    Organisations blocking the use of civilian nuclear power have four main arguments. My summary rebuttal in one slide.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  2. Retweeted
    Jan 3

    All the agricultural land on earth!

    Undo
  3. 3 hours ago

    Just got around to watching/listening to this while doing the ironing. Very nice! 👇👍

    Undo
  4. Retweeted
    9 hours ago

    The key differences here: the West keeps causing uncertain financial arrangements (causing bureaucratic delay) and doesn't properly support the heavy industry required to deliver nuclear plants. The East does. Bluntly? Order reactors. Rebuild industry.

    Undo
  5. Retweeted
    Jan 2

    First , then and now all agree: If we hope to reduce the effects of climate change, then we must preserve our nuclear plants that generate 24/7 clean energy.

    Undo
  6. Retweeted
    Jan 3

    "The unit was commissioned on 21 December 1973 and had since generated 264.9 TWh of electricity. In all its years of operation it has not experienced a single serious incident, Rosatom said." That's ~30% more power than Australia used last year. One, big, clean reliable plant:

    Undo
  7. Retweeted
    19 hours ago

    1. Good to know that still lets his inner Joe Romm out occasionally. It would be good, though, if we could not have the whole innovation/regulation debate again. via

    Show this thread
    Undo
  8. Retweeted
    Jan 3
    Undo
  9. Retweeted
    Jan 3

    Allemaal gezien? En Japan had Fukushima ... er is gewoonweg maar één moderne manier van elektriciteitsproductie die betaalbaar, schaalbaar en veilig is/kan zijn. We moeten gewoon leren van nucleaire fouten ipv alles overboord te gooien.

    Undo
  10. Retweeted
    20 Dec 2018

    Australia’s highest-value mineral export for this year was coal. It overtook iron ore for the first time in a long time - through a period of massive renewables growth. We need all clean energy options to turn that massive carbon ship around

    Undo
  11. Retweeted
    Jan 1

    ”You may have heard that we have 12 years to fix everything. This is well-meaning nonsense, but it’s still nonsense. We have both no time and more time. Climate change isn’t a cliff we fall off, but a slope we slide down.”

    Undo
  12. Retweeted
    Jan 4

    Again, if anyone wants to read and me’s critique of the concept of “ energy”, Abandoning the concept of Renewable Energy (Energy Policy), this link should be open until Feb 14.

    Undo
  13. 21 hours ago

    😐 Greenpeace resident sociopath Jan Haverkamp claiming that the IPCC report shows that eliminating nuclear power increases the probability of achieving the Paris Agreement goals. Please! If you still donate to , you must stop that TODAY.

    Undo
  14. Retweeted
    14 Dec 2018

    Two ways of reporting the same Nature paper: 1) 'People underestimate significance of diets to reduce climate change' - 2) 'Organic food worse for the climate' - (both press releases by study authors!)

    Undo
  15. Retweeted
    17 Dec 2018

    Radiation Exposures at a Glance: from where levels of radiation compare to the risk posed by a drink of alcohol a day, through high and low natural background areas, nuclear waste halls, and down to our very low normal levels.

    Undo
  16. Retweeted
    21 Dec 2018

    Moderne Hexenverbrennung: Die Ernte von morgen muss vernichtet werden, weil das Saatgut 0,1 Prozent enthält. , die in der EU zugelassen sind, aber wegen anti-wissenschaftlicher Politik nicht gesät werden dürfen. Das ist ! Danke !

    Undo
  17. Retweeted
    Jan 3

    “Make no mistake, we are facing a crisis with the future of the planet is at stake,” declares Connectictut as the state announces procurement of diverse set of carbon-free resources to meet ~45% of the state's use:

    Show this thread
    Undo
  18. Retweeted
    2 Jul 2018
    Replying to and

    The problem is that in Germany there are many with the100% renewable delusion including some climate scientists who say exactly that. The best we can do for now is to stop them intimidating our neighbours. France and Sweden need to lead and turn the tables.

    Undo
  19. Retweeted
    Jan 3

    Stel je eens voor: je bent de belichaming van de staat. Je hebt de plicht om voor de gezondheid van je burgers te zorgen, net nog in hoger beroep bevestigd door de rechter: wat kies je: 3100 doden per jaar door fijnstof of kernenergie uitfaseren?

    Undo
  20. Retweeted
    Jan 3

    Maar zeg eens zelf Peer: wat had jij gekozen? 3100 doden per jaar, of kernenergie uitfaseren uit Duitsland?

    Undo
  21. Retweeted
    Jan 4

    One of the keys was that the municipal councils had complete no-questions-asked veto right until the end and were reassured that they could step out of the process if the people felt uncomfortable with the idea.

    Undo

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·