There is no way to hold this view unless you view men as autonomous humans and women as commoditieshttps://twitter.com/robinhanson/status/989535565895864320 …
-
-
Replying to @amanda_pompili
The only feasible "redistribution" I can see is development of sex robots. But it's not for the state to do, and for all I know they're not banned. You can't "redistribute" sex with live people.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ramendik
Money for research on science really is a zero sum game, and hopefully we have more pressing priorities
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @amanda_pompili
I am certainly not calling for state funding, especially because the fundamental science is all done anyway. It's purely a corporate matter now. And it's worked on, early models are available.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ramendik @amanda_pompili
It's just disappointing how people spend time dreaming of administrative solutions instead of working on technical ones. Incels are nothing compared to the US pro-life movement. Imagine if they put all the mega$$$ in artificial uterus development to save fetuses, not propaganda!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Thing is, the whole incel thing isn't really about sex, nor is the pro-life movement about saving babies, conservatives have proven time and time again they don't care about kids. It's about power over women and their bodies.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.