@NotOfSuns Yes. Grievously.
-
-
Replying to @EndOfSequence
@EndOfSequence@SlipOfFault Evidence/argument? There has to be some selection for some traits, right?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NotOfSuns
@EndOfSequence@SlipOfFault Lots of conflicting evidence on Wikipedia https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fertility_and_intelligence …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NotOfSuns
@NotOfSuns@SlipOfFault Good traits are those which are selected for. There are myriad examples where high IQ did not qualify as good.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @EndOfSequence
@EndOfSequence@NotOfSuns@SlipOfFault I would bet nature selects for higher IQ, but there are tradeoffs such as skull size, energy cost.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ObjectOfObjects
@ObjectOfObjects@EndOfSequence@NotOfSuns@SlipOfFault I would bet nature selects for average IQ because evidence.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AmbiguityForm
@AmbiguityForm@EndOfSequence@NotOfSuns@SlipOfFault What evidence? You can't just say "evidence."2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @ObjectOfObjects
@ObjectOfObjects@EndOfSequence@NotOfSuns@SlipOfFault The graph that looks like a boa constrictor with an elephant inside.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AmbiguityForm
@AmbiguityForm@EndOfSequence@NotOfSuns@SlipOfFault I guess you don't want to communicate your beliefs.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ObjectOfObjects
@ObjectOfObjects@EndOfSequence@NotOfSuns@SlipOfFault I believe most IQs are within 2SD of the mean.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@AmbiguityForm @ObjectOfObjects @NotOfSuns Average IQ is <1. If you limit your sample to humans, we will need a longer experimental trial.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.