Any argument against self-driving cars that brings up the trolley problem is also an argument against humans driving cars.
-
-
New technology is scary, but we can cover the risk involved in tornadoes, fires, and sometimes even floods. Acts of god we can handle, but a vehicle that doesn't drive drunk thwarts us?
-
I guess this may not be obvious, so I'll also mention; things may be chaotic for a while, but iff SDVs cause less deaths/accidents than human drivers, insurance will become cheaper over time. The insurance company that (correctly) figures this out first gets the richest.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I was kind of intending that as a reducto ad absurdum of the idea of "holding accountable".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.