Tweetovi
- Tweetovi, trenutna stranica.
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj
Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @EmirEfen
Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @EmirEfen
-
Staying home to wait for a package delivery seems peak anthropocene.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Emir Efendic proslijedio/la je Tweet
Journal: Ready to submit your manuscript? Me: Yup! (cracking my knuckles) Journal: Do you have all these ready? 1. Your login details 2. Your ORCID ID 3. Manuscript 4. Each image as separate file 5. Cover letter 6. COI for each author 7. Author signatures for all
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
That feeling when you realise an email about your paper is just spam and not someone being actually interested...pic.twitter.com/Kg5DYGF3ZD
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
A nice paper on the
#WEIRD problem in psych. Makes me think of language capabilities of researchers as a caveat. I select US & UK samples cause my English is good enough to write precise manipulations.https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/01/psychologys-stubborn-diversity-problem/605446/ …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
I'm proud that we also pre-registered our predictions for all but one study; everything is open https://osf.io/ygeha/ ; and the pre-print is here: https://psyarxiv.com/2vmtg Thanks again to
@PCalseyde &@tony_m_evans. We now await the algorithm's retaliation.pic.twitter.com/9e9oYjps86Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Finally, it seems that the reliance on response time as a cue is stronger if people don't know much about the prediction task. In one study, people from the US (who don't know much about English football) relied on response time more to judge prediction quality from an A.pic.twitter.com/SnSs0VWsIS
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Also, for Hs, response time seems to be a highly evaluable cue as it appears bet-sub and with-sub, while it seems people need some experience with an A, for the relation to stick...pic.twitter.com/lIVELaxO1Z
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
It is a curious asymmetry. So what's the reason? Well, slow response times signal more effort for both A and H...but the relation between effort and quality breaks down for A because people think prediction is easy for As, but difficult for Hs.pic.twitter.com/F1lnRImFdL
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
In this 9 (read them, nine) study paper, we show that response time differently affects how people judge predictions made by algorithms (A) vs. humans (H). Generally slow A predictions = bad, but slow H predictions = goodpic.twitter.com/f3G5T9YbVQ
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
New publication! Ever gotten some advice from an
#algorithm? Just accepted in OBHDP! "Slow response time undermines trust in algorithmic (but not human)" predictions w/@PCalseyde &@tony_m_evans Really proud of this one. Let me explain
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Emir Efendic proslijedio/la je Tweet
Our main finding: In all these countries, participants were most likely to sacrifice in Switch, then in Loop, then in Footbridge. Universality of Switch-Loop-Footbridge suggests differences are best explained by basic cognitive processes, rather than cultural norms.pic.twitter.com/lPmaqkJsoG
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Emir Efendic proslijedio/la je Tweet
I really like this paper - even though there are no flashy results, we have cool moral dilemmas in three languages, 2x2x2x2 design with a large sample and during the last R&R I learned that Kant was something of an antivaxer ,)https://twitter.com/bahniks/status/1216772223559786496 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Emir Efendic proslijedio/la je Tweet
Our paper on wording effects in moral judgment with
@EmirEfen and@mVranka is now published: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0033294119896061 …pic.twitter.com/avWNz9gS2p
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Emir Efendic proslijedio/la je Tweet
It's disappointing to see an article about misconduct for which I was consulted stating that 3 experts took a look at the data, but only mentions 2 of them by name. Those 2 are both men. I am not mentioned. One of the 100s of little insults
#WomenInSTEM have to deal with.Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Emir Efendic proslijedio/la je Tweet
The next Society for Risk Analysis-Europe Benelux conference takes place in Eindhoven on March 24. More information and the call for abstracts (deadline January 17th) can be found on http://www.sraeurope.eu/5th-sra-e-benelux-meeting-2020-eindhoven …pic.twitter.com/oGvrWGIenK
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
A lot of these are probs joke answers, but there are clusters and the fact that one is obviously on the Balkans is just

!https://twitter.com/jpiacenza/status/1214897192386908160 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
A good observation. Choosing the delayed larger reward is often a privilege in real life. We write about immediate choices as bad instances of impatience when in fact it could be the most optimal choice given person/situation.https://twitter.com/Adamdbulley/status/1214381098584535040 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
I’ve so rarely come across so many instances of groupthink as in science. What is it that makes scientists so wedded to their theories? This example in Alzheimer’s research seems really odious.https://pocket.co/xdR1Xj
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Often, similarities between groups of people are disregarded. This nice paper highlights the extent of the similarities nicely: https://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2018-66320-001.html …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Emir Efendic proslijedio/la je Tweet
I made an app that shows ggplot2 code & plot. Hopefully useful for learning/teaching/understanding ggplot2. The app lives here: https://huygens.science.uva.nl/ggPlotteR/
#dataViz#ggplot2#shinypic.twitter.com/skLij2TYkDHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

