Nice piece of, er, 'positive' campaigning by Sutton Lib Dems. As usual comments suppressed. What do you think @Emina_ibrahim @BonnieCraven ?pic.twitter.com/fCY02eYpeg
-
Seen more activity from Labour than Lib Dems this time. Recent poll (http://www.suttonguardian.co.uk/news/15291404.Brexit__the_NHS__the_economy___this_is_what_Sutton_and_Cheam_s_General_Election_candidates_think_about_the_key_issues/?ref=mrb&lp=19 …) suggests you need to vote Tory to stop Labour.pic.twitter.com/oCujZHmPSY
Wonder at what point we know what core LD vote is to justify tactical voting - when should LDs tactically vote Labour?
-
-
That graph size-wise includes the Green vote in the Labour figure. I've checked. It's all very weird.
-
Here according to the chart they were within a whisker !! Well at least until you get a calculatorpic.twitter.com/hO2VD7FW6d
-
There's nothing as bent as a Lib Dem graphic. Before you know it, they'll be 'edging ahead' in their literature. Always happens.
-
Betting odds replacing graph now even in radio interviews. If anyone knows about odds it's not true reflection of probability
-
Betting odds reflect what a bookie is willing to pay and factors at play include if loads of people bet on a outcome the odds reduce.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
I do hope that does not go through LD expenses as a national campaign. Graph is an exact replica of a Lib Dem Sutton & Cheam leaflet graph.
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. Undo
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.