Why might have these 4 retested positive for the virus? The likeliest explanation is faulty diagnostic tests. By the state's own admission, they work 30-50% of the time. Scientists told us false positives AND false negatives were both possible.
-
-
Afficher cette discussion
-
Notably, these 4 retest cases do not show up in Wuhan's stats, bc China doesn't count asymptomatic carriers and retests. "I am baffled" as to why China doesn't include asymptomatic cases (some of whom are likely infectious) one of the Wuhan doctors told
@Amy_23_ChengAfficher cette discussion -
This isn't to say China is covering anything up. But as US and Italy surpass China in case count, that a country with months more experience handling the virus is still struggling to ID/understand this virus is worrying for how the rest of the world can contain this pandemic
Afficher cette discussion
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Peer reviewed science will solve that, if it's accepted.
-
No one has time for that!
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Ever wonder why they decided to name the virus SARS-CoV-2 and the disease COVID-19?
-
CO= corona VI=virus D=december 19=date 2019
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
But it's a small sample, possibilities could be wrong measurements or there's two virus
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Computer virus is stubborn but this virus diɛ eno dey hear o eii
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Well...just

- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.