I'd very much like this cis man to accurately describe to me the interaction between FDA regulations of anti-androgens, the state of bathroom politics, and pickles. https://twitter.com/victormlee/status/997308952877690881 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
And I'd be very happy to engage on the first two topics. The lattermost I am not informed on. You are also making the exception logical fallacy in your comment, above.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @victormlee
There is only one topic, and there is no logical fallacy. I am not here to engage you.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
Well, with all due respect, I think you need to work on your understanding of logic, then. That happens to be an area of expertise for me. Have a good day.
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @victormlee @EmilyGorcenski
Translation: "I am blissfully unaware of my biases and emotional responses and have learned to rationalize them, and this makes me better than other people."
2 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @RuckCohlchez @EmilyGorcenski
I'm used to the ad hominem attacks when there is lack of logically-based counterargument. :) Have a magical day! :)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @victormlee @RuckCohlchez
This is not an ad hominem attack, you should work on your logic expertise. This is merely calling you an asshole, not saying you're argument is wrong because you're an asshole.
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @RuckCohlchez
That's exactly what an ad hominem attack is :). Thank you for reinforcing my point. Cheers.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @victormlee @RuckCohlchez
No, an ad hominem attack is debasing your *argument* based on a personal attack. Just attacking you is called an "insult" and has no bearing on rhetoric.
2 replies 0 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @RuckCohlchez
Au contraire, ad hominem attacks by DEFINITION are about avoiding genuine debate of substantive issues by turning to insults. By DEFINITION, ad hominem attacks don't "debase" arguments. They are done as insults to AVOID addressing the substance of an issue. QED. :)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
In other words, no one invited you to debate, you invited yourself, and you're unwelcome.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.