Gab: The settlement was an agreement between private parties Reality: It was a settlement in a lawsuit Gab: It was a quid pro quo deal to agree not to be sued Reality: It was a settlement... IN A LAWSUIT
-
-
Show this thread
-
What's being referred to here is the consent decree that three militia defendants entered into in the case of City of Charlottesville et al vs Pennsylvania Lightfoot Militia et al.
Show this thread -
The City of Charlottesville along with several local businesses sued several parties in an attempt to prevent them from engaging in future militia activities in Charlottesville. Several parties have settled.
Show this thread -
The settlement agreement stipulates among other things: - you can't bring 2 or more people back to Cville with a gun or any other implement of a riot - you agree not to countersue
Show this thread -
Meanwhile the Gab juris doctorates have decided that the agreement is covered by contract law, involves only non-state parties, and is an agreement to avoid being sued. It's literally a settlement in a suit brought by a city government.
Show this thread -
Dunning and Kruger need to redo their study now that gab has been invented.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
oh my fucking god
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.