-
-
When I expose the Nazis, I want to be really clear I am not running afoul of any laws when I do so. I make sure to explicitly call out what my intentions are and specifically ask my followers not to harass or anything like that.
1 reply 4 retweets 65 likesShow this thread -
I don't post addresses; if I can determine the person is in an occupation where they or their clients may be at risk (e.g. security), I don't post photos.
1 reply 2 retweets 27 likesShow this thread -
And truth is an absolute defense against defamation. So I have to be extremely certain. Of course, if I get one wrong I would apologize and delete the tweets.
1 reply 2 retweets 28 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
Is there a public interest defamation standard (analogous to the public individual standard)? Because if so you’d have an even stronger hand in this.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MultipleNights
Defamation is a really hard standard to meet.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
To prove it one would need to show that I was lying maliciously with intent to cause damage to one's character. I'm clearly not doing that, but I also post my evidence trail to show how I arrive at the conclusion so it reinforces that I am not making things up.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
