A few weeks ago, I asked why teachers weren't striking like the students were. Several people told me it was illegal so it'd never happen. Now: an "illegal" strike in WV, and a planned strike in OK, where it is "illegal" to plan such an action.
Like, you seem to be reading a lot into something that's not a thing. Do I need to show receipts? I'm going to show receipts.
-
-
First, I tweeted this actual question:https://twitter.com/EmilyGorcenski/status/966443540527099906 …
-
Then I got several answers along this vein:https://twitter.com/MagistraGoetz/status/966445247994744832 …
-
Then I simply pointed out that sequence of events:https://twitter.com/EmilyGorcenski/status/970687430901882881 …
-
And finally, you came in, going on about... I dunno, fuck all quantum chromodynamics or something not having anything to do with these events.
-
You were conflating political walkouts with labor strikes. Not the same thing, not the same rules.
-
Look, the distinction is fucking meaningless for this discussion. Unionized strike or not, the point was the answers I received were shown to be meaningless in light of recent events. That's it. That point holds regardless of what you call it.
-
Your pedantry is really just MRA "well-actually" in disguise. It bears no relevance to the discussion whatsoever. Call it a walkout, call it a strike, call it a spontaneous vacation for all I care, it doesn't actually matter, nor does the legal standing of any of those things.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.