-
-
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
we get it, you all flip out on a nuclear scale whenever someone says something negative about one of your favs - but you'll be able to participate in civic life much more effectively (and healthily) if you just admit that sometimes your favs make the wrong choices
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
oh, so she wasn't secretly running interference for intel gathering purposes? ok then
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @johansilentio__
She made a bad choice to do that. Both can be true.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
so it's your position that she *was* gaining intel secretly, which was itself a bad choice? that seems like the weirdest possible position to take on the whole matter
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @johansilentio__
Yeah. I think it was a bad idea to have the meeting, but it was done with good intentions. Like taking a date to Applebees.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
it's certainly possible i suppose, i just think it's more likely that she just went and then realized that people are upset about it so she's giving different stories about it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @johansilentio__
I think the other activists who were there the other night who have been saying for the past 24 hours that's what happened should be believed.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
i don't disbelieve them, i just wonder about the infosec usefulness of attending a party explicitly catering towards the dregs of political society and whether or not it's worth the resulting hubbub
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The answer is "evidently not." That's a hard lesson learned.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.