I've now spoken to multiple people close to Chelsea and everyone says basically the same thing that I've been tweeting since yesterday.
-
Show this thread
-
I think she should say this herself. But the idea that she was actively seeking support of Nazis is a patently absurd idea.
5 replies 15 retweets 94 likesShow this thread -
Emily G Retweeted
Really? We're gonna go with "the person who spent seven years in the clink for exposing war crimes isn't seeking Nazi support" and "the person who faced down fascists in Charlottesville and nearly died isn't a Nazi apologist" is a tough sell? https://twitter.com/FactsMatterNow/status/955511060479561728 …
Emily G added,
This Tweet is unavailable.3 replies 22 retweets 94 likesShow this thread -
It couldn't perhaps be something like, "high profile people use their access to accomplish different forms of activism that most people can't" no that would never be a thing why would a famous person have access to opposition media
5 replies 14 retweets 73 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
That's convenient. Who else gets a free pass for lending their credibility to white supremacy?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @estarianne
Have you tried giving her a pass to allow her to explain the context of one single photo?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
It's not one photo, it's the fact that they used her attendance to sell their cause as kinder and gentler
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Yeah, that's on them. I'm not giving her a pass for it, but to jump to her being a Nazi or Nazi enabler is fucking ridiculous.
-
-
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski
Well, they are manipulative fucks and that's why we don't negotiate with them. Hopefully she knows now.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.