I've now spoken to multiple people close to Chelsea and everyone says basically the same thing that I've been tweeting since yesterday.
-
-
What she did was give more media attention to the gathering of a hate group than it ever would have garnered otherwise, especially the same day as the Women’s March. Who cares what her explanation for intentionally helping hem that way is?
-
Your take is literally "why counterprotest it just gives them more attention" which has been refuted so many times I can't believe I have to explain it to you. Did it backfire? Yep. It can backfire. That sucks. We shouldn't disposer her because it backfired.
-
*disposer her = dispose of her. I don't even know how I accomplished that typo
-
No worries, my cracked screen typos have reached a zenith

-
(i was on my laptop
)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That's convenient. Who else gets a free pass for lending their credibility to white supremacy?
-
Have you tried giving her a pass to allow her to explain the context of one single photo?
-
It's not one photo, it's the fact that they used her attendance to sell their cause as kinder and gentler
-
Yeah, that's on them. I'm not giving her a pass for it, but to jump to her being a Nazi or Nazi enabler is fucking ridiculous.
-
Well, they are manipulative fucks and that's why we don't negotiate with them. Hopefully she knows now.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I once hung out with some LessCSS users.
#knowyourenemyThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
With respect Emily do you think it’s fair to expect Chelsea to speak to wikileaks, russian election interference and Putin’s anti-gay rights campaign? If she wants to garner any trust from me I’m gonna need some denunciation of all of that...pic.twitter.com/9jSDejxUzM
-
Her association with wikileaks requires an explanation in my book, even if it’s not fair or anachronistic. At least a denunciation of Putin’s anti-gay laws and the pogrom in Chechnya?https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/21/world/europe/chechnya-russia-attacks-gays.html …
-
I supported her commutation
Handing her power to write laws is going to require some trust building. -
Please review her TL. I approached it with an open mind but what I found didn’t dispel my mistrust of a wikileaker.
-
I think objections on her policy positions is fair. I’m not intentionally misunderstanding or taking things out of context to abuse her. I looked for what is available publicly. After doing so I’m now hoping for loud denunciations of wikileaks, Assange, Putin and Trump.pic.twitter.com/pmGpzToAhk
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
