No, they are not terrorists. "Terrorist" does not mean "people who cause harm."
-
-
1. You are certainly persistent in trying to explain white supremacy to me. It does matter, of course. Different white supremacist segments can be more or less active, or rising or falling, simultaneously. In the 1980s-1990s, for example, Christian Identity
-
2. was one of the main sources of white supremacist violence. Today it is far less significant as a source of violence--so someone trying to deter or investigate white supremacist violence would be errant in placing too many resources there.
-
3. Or, for another example, racist skinheads are far more likely to attack the homeless (they have committed a number of murders against the homeless) than other types of white supremacists are.
-
I am not trying to explain white supremacy to you nor am I trying to invalidate these distinctions. What I am trying to do is--as a survivor--critique your dismissal of the alt-right's terrorism (and that of their allies) as what it is.
-
And mind you, I am coming at this from the perspective of the person who wrote the document warning Charlottesville officials of the violence to come, as someone who correctly predicted 2 months before that Vanguard would commit a terrorist attack at UTR...
-
as someone who was given their planning chatlogs and as someone who survived attacks at three events in Charlottesville this summer. I have seen intimately their violence.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.