I'm just really wanting to see you make the argument that someone legally open carrying is sufficient justification to use force against other, unaffiliated people who aren't in the area.
-
-
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @EmmeOlivera
Very tired of 'unarmed students' attacked by Nazis being the narrative. Let's at least tell the truth. There were known violent Antifa at that statue. Did you not know any of them?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RedCville @EmmeOlivera
I knew precisely three people when I got to the statue. And none of them were armed nor acted in violence.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @EmmeOlivera
Chelsea? Frank? Yeah they're non violent from everything I have seen. You really should look in to who these people are. I also believe you were elsewhere when the first violent act occurred.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Any violent attacks that occurred before we were surrounded are irrelevant, btw.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @RedCville @EmmeOlivera
I'm stating a matter of factual record. You can't say someone who may have slapped a phone justified a chemical attack many minutes later by a superior force who trapped innocent people.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Innocent people being trapped by aggressive, violent people with superior numbers and torches make a legitimate 3rd party self-defense argument. The converse is not true.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @EmmeOlivera
Also go and tell court how scared you were of these violent people but you stalk them regularly. Starting with Chris at Walmart. You weren't even by that statue you followed the entire march.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
You love this stalking argument but there is no evidence for it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.