Right. And that photo doesn't show a holster big enough.
-
-
Any violent attacks that occurred before we were surrounded are irrelevant, btw.
-
Keep reaching.
-
I'm stating a matter of factual record. You can't say someone who may have slapped a phone justified a chemical attack many minutes later by a superior force who trapped innocent people.
-
Innocent people being trapped by aggressive, violent people with superior numbers and torches make a legitimate 3rd party self-defense argument. The converse is not true.
-
Also go and tell court how scared you were of these violent people but you stalk them regularly. Starting with Chris at Walmart. You weren't even by that statue you followed the entire march.
-
You're flailing around like a drowning person. Because you know you're going to lose lololol.
-
I'm not flailing at all. I keep making the same factual statements I've been making for 3 months.
-
Smarter move would be to stop being so damn loyal to the organization that's not an organization, so it's claimed and say 'hey I am only responsible for my actions, I'm unsure of what others did and maybe I should look in to that some more'

- 17 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
